Tag Archives: movie reviews

“The Bounty Hunter” Doesn’t Find Good Ratings


Ask any of my friends who were with me in the Sherlock Holmes theater how much I freaked out when I learned Gerard Butler was going to be in a new movie during the previews this past December.

To salvage some of my dignity, let’s just say it was a significantly feminine moment. And I’m sure it wasn’t just me.

For weeks, females across America have waited impatiently for the premier of The Bounty Hunter starring the Scottish heart-throb and Jennifer Aniston. Their characters, Milo and Nicole, are a formerly married couple with many issues.  Their number one problem? He, as a bounty hunter, must collect her and deliver her to the nearest prison for skipping bail over a fender bender.

I suggest marriage counseling.

I also suggest waiting to see this movie until it hits two-dollar Tuesdays. Writer Sarah Thorpe sure came up with a creative and original story, but the publicity department needs to understand that revealing all funniest jokes in the previews consequently makes the rest of the movie a let-down. Not to devalue those jokes – they were hysterical – but anyone who watched the preview expected them.

Some subplots seemed a bit outlandish and their connection to the major remained uncertain or outlandish throughout, never being fully or sensibly resolved. Common sense was not applied much either. A woman as intelligent as Nicole is supposed to be would have had enough intuition to take off her five inch stilettos when sneaking through an abandoned warehouse. The people in the next theatre over probably could have heard them, never mind the villain (and how exactly was he connected again …?)

Certain scenes did drag on. Any move, be it romcom, thriller, or tear-jerker, should not leave the audience bored during at any point in time. Whenever a movie feels like it is plodding through with absolutely nothing conducive to the plot, it slides down a notch in my book.

Another fail from this movie? Two Kee$ha songs. I mean please, there is so much quality from which to choose. One song I could have handled, but two?

I don’t mean to come across as whiny. The film does have some god qualities. Anniston and Butler do have a great dynamic; it is very obvious that they “hate” each other after the divorce, with the clear leftover emotions.  Both being talented comedic actors, they portray convincing clashing characters to provide the comedy. Her workaholic and neat-freak nature is classically pitted against his. He is … let’s settle with the phrase “a bit rough around the edges,” which works well against her perfection. Without  Gerard, it would have been a total flop.

The final verdict: it provides an entertaining two hours. But if you haven’t seen the previews, don’t. You’ll like it better, I promise.

Copyright Aspiring Novelist. All rights reserved.


“Shutter Island” a Surprise Thriller




When one sees a preview for a movie featuring a woman disintegrating into ash and gnarled old men hollering while leaping at Leonardo DiCaprio, one tends to believe that such a movie is a horror film.

False.

Shutter Island, based off the novel by Dennis Lehane, is in fact a psychological thriller.  Had I known this fact in advance, I would not have to have been almost dragged kicking and screaming to the theatre.

Imagine my pleasant surprise to find myself viewing a psychological flick that had me on the edge of my seat and yelling at the screen during parts that outraged me the screen instead.

US Marshall Teddy Daniels (Di Caprio) is summoned in 1954 to Shutter Island, a mental hospital for the convicted criminally insane to investigate the disappearance of an inmate.  Quite predictably, a severe storm traps him there, and he is unable to take the ferry back home to Boston. During his extended stay, he begins to uncover more and more of what appears to be serious abuse of the patients, including imitations of Nazi-esque brain experiments.

It also is revealed that the directors of the institution have lured him there because of his own dark past with which he is still struggling.  If he is to avoid becoming their next guinea pig, he must both outsmart them and let go of the past still haunting him.

DiCaprio’s performance is, once again, outstanding.  He expertly embodies a trained detective hot on the trail. Just as brilliant is the other side of Teddy: an ex-soldier scarred from witnessing the Holocaust.  Still more superb is the wounded man grieving for the loss of his beloved wife and learning to accept her death.

The perfect Boston accent works in his favor too.

Some plot twists are admittedly (disappointingly) predictable, but to an extent every plot in every movie is.  However, the last heart-pounding five minutes and concluding line, delivered almost in a whisper by Leo, salvages any dissatisfaction.  If a number one ranking and an over $41 million dollar gross on opening night is not proof enough of a good movie, I don’t know what is.

Director Martin Scorsese’s name most likely contributed greatly to the large grossing, yet he still deserves a pat on the back.  He stayed true to the original novel and delivered to the audience an excellent film.  He can now add another stellar work to his shelf.

Copyright Aspiring Novelist. All rights reserved.


Success!


Let us (or at least me) always remember this day, February 3, 2010, as a Most Historic Day: the Day I Became a Real Writer.

That’s right I’m published! Published! My name is IN PRINT along with something I WROTE in the school paper. Let’s party harty!

My Status, Goals, and other joyous news (!!!!) to come later (I sense I’ve been saying this quite a bit recently; funny how life gets in the way of all your most carefully laid plans, innit?), but for now, I’m going to post my featured article here and under journalism. Celebrate with me, ladies and gents!

“When in Rome” Just Your Typical “Rome” – ance

With Valentines Day just around the corner, I defy you to find better time for a romantic comedy. Every hopeless romantic uses this time of year as the perfect excuse to splurge. She will spend close to ten dollars on a movie of which she could pretty much figure out the plot and the ending just from the previews, but still enjoy it.

“When In Rome,” starring Kristen Bell and Josh Duhamel, is exactly this type of film. Beth (Bell) and Nick (Duhamel) meet in Rome, Italy when they are maid-of-honor and best man at a mutual acquaintance’s wedding and immediately recognize the chemistry between them.

However, things turn horribly wrong when Beth witnesses a clandestine kiss between Nick and a random Italian woman. After a full bottle of champagne, she swipes coins from La Fontana d’Amore (The Fountain of Love) on a whim and later finds herself pursued by the five men whose coins she stole – including Nick.

The movie, directed by Mark Steven Johnson, is both well casted and scripted, and all actors are convincing in their roles: Beth is a workaholic who fights love whenever it comes her way yet can’t help herself falling for Nick, a player who throws his comfortable bachelor lifestyle away for her. Their developing romance is convincing and heartwarming, and the extra comedy provided by the sidekick best friends often has the audiences rolling.

While the writers shaped excellent dialogue and a good central story, they probably could have done a better job producing convincing subplots. What began as an exaggerated joke (the fact that Nick was struck by lightning in college) morphed into a major storyline and came across as far-fetched.

They also could have worked a bit more on making the whole thing less predictable. Yes, there is a significant plot twist, but it doesn’t occur until the last two minutes of the movie. The rest follows the basic chick flick recipe, which – though entertaining – is not very intellectually stimulating.

The title is also misleading. Most people would assume from it and the previews that the movie would be based in Rome. In fact, the majority of the film takes place in New York City. Now, as a New Yorker I love the Big Apple, but if I wanted to watch a movie set there, I’d pull down Maid in Manhattan off my shelf.

On the whole, seeing the film is an enjoyable experience and would be a fun excursion for a girl’s night out, but I would suggest holding off until the DVD release. Save your ten bucks for a box of chocolate.

Copyright Aspiring Novelist. All rights reserved.


Expanding Horizons


I’m trying my hand at journalism. It’s not a particular medium I have ever worked in before, but have been encouraged to consider as a possible career (to which I replied, “No, Mom, I want to be an editor and publish the NOVELS I write.”) but nevertheless, the notion has stayed as that tiny bug in my head urging me to do something different and step out of my comfort zone.

Lo and behold, at 6:30PM on Thursday, January 28, 2010 I found myself squishing into a chair with my dear friend in the office of the student newspaper, listening intently for a sign of a story I could possibly cover if the staff were to graciously allow me to take a crack at it with a letter to the editor in hand as proof that I could actually produce something of substance. And they did! I will be writing a review of When In Rome after the debut to (hopefully) in next week’s issue of the paper :) Here’s hoping.

I’m still not entirely sure how I’ll go about this. I mean I know that basics of journalism: short, concise, witty, facts to snag and maintain attention for a minute or so while the reader skims your piece. I’m thinking it won’t be that difficult to begin and if it is, I’m a fast learner and could get the hang of things quickly. I would LOVE to see my work actually printed out on paper that hasn’t come from my printer or my stories only on the internet (posted on my sidebar under “My Work” for those of you who have not seen them). I also figure with this and the creative writing class, I should be able to balance all my school work along with writing. With deadlines (which I hate for works I’m passionate about – seriously, don’t rush me, it’ll get done when it gets done and it’ll be better that way) will keep me on track and ensure that I write at minimum two times a week. It will also be great to put on a resume and give me more experience in a wide variety of writing styles. I fully advocate pushing oneself to one’s limits.

So I’m giving it a shot. The letter to the editor I wrote has now been posted under my work, so even if it doesn’t make it in, it’s still published here. It’s a response to a review of the new Sherlock Holmes which I felt did not do the film justice and is pretty similar to one of my earlier posts, but hey, I think it came out pretty well.

Creative Writing Status and Goals

On track with everything, still shooting for more Rescue Me and another chapter of Damn Brits typed by Monday night. Cross your fingers.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 195 other followers

%d bloggers like this: